In their desire to validate the questionable case for evolution, conventional biologists will appeal to local adaptation, variation, and ecological speciation as supporting evidence. This is exactly what happened with recent research regarding lipstick vine (Aeschynanthus) speciation.¹

Bird calls are something we often take for granted. After all, when we listen to them, we hear squawks, warbles, and chirps. Could there actually be information, something complex, that they’re transmitting? Scientists now say “yes” after studying a fun-sounding bird from New Zealand—the pukeko.¹

What was the pre-Flood world like thousands of years ago?^1,2 With the advent of unearthing soft tissues in fossils,³ creation scientists continue to construct a picture of the world before the Flood.

Research into insect eyes continues to reveal amazing structure and function. For example, although fruit flies’ eyes are attached firmly to their heads, it was discovered that their retinas can move internally to smoothly track visual motion.¹

The word evolution is often used imprecisely, leading the public to believe that any biological change is evolution, and, therefore, it’s a fact.¹ But phenotypic variation within the same species has nothing to do with evolution.