Study Fails to Prove Flight Feathers Evolved | The Institute for Creation Research

Study Fails to Prove Flight Feathers Evolved

A recently discovered Microraptor fossil reveals an odd-looking bird with two front wings and feathers on its back legs, giving it the appearance of having "four wings." The startling fossil reflects some of evolution's unsolved mysteries, like the origins of flight, wings, and feathers. Could Microraptor help answer these questions?

Nature Communications published a new Microraptor study that assumes modern bird wings evolved from gliding wings. This despite the fact that this ancient bird had asymmetrical feathers on both its front and hind limbs—feathers like modern flying birds.1 Tangible evidence points to a very different conclusion than evolution from gliding wings.2

The study authors wrote, "Symmetric 'flight' feathers first evolved in dinosaurs for non-aerodynamic functions, later being adapted to form lifting surfaces."1 But did data or belief in evolution back this assertion?

In their research, they created a scale model of the 30-inch-long Microraptor and tested its flight performance in a wind tunnel.

The authors claimed that Microraptor could glide exceptionally well and could have glided close to 315 feet if it started from a height of 100 feet. However, their model bird was rigid, and they left out critical tests for true wing-powered flight.1

While this unusual bird was first described from specimens found in rocks supposedly 130 million years old, it had asymmetrical feathers—as do modern flying and gliding birds—on both its front and hind limbs.3,4 Today, symmetrical feathers, not used to create an aerofoil, are still found on flightless birds like the ostrich.

Evolutionists have long struggled to explain the sudden appearance of a myriad of features, including symmetrical flight feathers. The best story it offers is that over millions of years, dinosaurs' scales somehow grew into symmetrical gliding feathers that then evolved into asymmetrical flying feathers.1,3 However, this view is so lacking in scientific substance that even other evolutionists disagree with it.5

Creation scientists reference the Word of God that tells us all birds were created fully-formed on Day Five of the creation week—only 6,000 years ago. Birds with symmetrical feathers, like the ostrich, were created on Day Five and were never intended to fly. Birds like the Microraptor would have been created on that same day, only with asymmetrical wings giving them the ability to fly.6 There is no fossil evidence of symmetrical feathers evolving into asymmetrical feathers.

Although the new study claims to provide insight into "the evolution of feathered flight," like other claims of dinosaur-to-bird evolution, its promise doesn't fly.2 The elegant and precise flight-specialized feathers of the Microraptor reflect intentional design.

Reference

  1. Dyke, G. et al. 2013. Aerodynamic performance of the feathered dinosaur Microraptor and the evolution of feathered flight. Nature Communications. 4 (2489).
  2. Thomas, B. 2013. Were There Really Feathered Dinosaurs? In Morris III, H. et al., Creation Basics and Beyond. Dallas, Texas: Institute for Creation Research.
  3. Xu, X. et al. 2003. Four-winged dinosaurs from China. Nature. 421 (6921): 335-340.
  4. Li, Q. et al. 2012. Reconstruction of Microraptor and the evolution of iridescent plumage. Science. 335 (6073): 1215-1219.
  5. For example, evolutionist Alan Feduccia once wrote, "The major, and most worrying, problem of the feathered dinosaur hypothesis is that the integumental structures have been homologized with avian feathers on the basis of anatomically and paleontologically unsound and misleading information." See Feduccia, A. T. et al. 2005. Do Feathered Dinosaurs Exist? Testing the Hypothesis on Neontological and Paleontological Evidence. Journal of Morphology. 266: 134.
  6. Thomas, B. Is New Fossil a Bird-Eating Dinosaur? Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org December 7, 2011, accessed October 3, 2013.

* Dr. Clarey is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in geology from Western Michigan University.

Article posted on October 7, 2013.

The Latest
NEWS
Seastar Skeletal Evolution?
The beautiful sea stars (“starfish”), classified as echinoderms, are one of the most easily identifiable marine invertebrates, with their...

NEWS
Nitrogen Networks Negate Naturalism
The element nitrogen is critical in the living world. It is a basic building block of structural and regulatory proteins, nucleic acids, and chlorophyll...

NEWS
March 2025 ICR Wallpaper
"Keep your heart with all diligence, For out of it spring the issues of life." (Proverbs 4:23 NKJV) ICR's March 2025 wallpaper is...

CREATION.LIVE PODCAST
Moonwalker: The Incredible True Story of General Charlie Duke...
What would it be like to walk on the moon? General Charlie Duke is one of the privileged few who can claim to have enjoyed such an awe-inspiring...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Lightning!
by Michael Stamp and Susan Windsor* You're never too young to be a creation scientist and explore our Creator's world. Kids, discover...

APOLOGETICS
When Is Dry Desert a Navigable River?
Should a desert’s dryland arroyo that goes a year or more without any rainfall be called a “wetland” or a “navigable river”?1 Consider...

ACTS & FACTS
Sequoia National Park: Giant Trees Exhibit Expert Engineering
Question: What are the biggest trees on planet Earth? Answer: Giant sequoias (Sequoiadendron giganteum).1 They grow on west-facing slopes...

ACTS & FACTS
Jesus—There’s Just Something About That Name
A nurse who worked with me would pleasantly call in patients by saying, “Mr._____, it’s checkup time!” Periodic checkups are good....

ACTS & FACTS
What Is Truth?
Pilate therefore said to Him, “Are You a king then?” Jesus answered, “You say rightly that I am a king. For this cause I was born,...

ACTS & FACTS
The 3-D Genome: A Marvel of Adaptive Engineering
In eukaryotes, which are organisms with nucleated cells, the vast majority of hereditary and coded information is stored, copied, and replicated...