Did Hebrew Authors Fake the Creation Account? | The Institute for Creation Research

Did Hebrew Authors Fake the Creation Account?

My family’s copy of Joseph Rhymer’s Atlas of the Biblical World echoes what many Bible scholars have taught about Genesis: “There are two creation accounts.”1 One account spans Genesis 1:1–2:4, and a second begins with 2:5. Rhymer asserts that around 500 B.C. unknown Hebrew writers crafted a fake creation history that borrowed bits of Mesopotamian myths so that the Hebrew exiles would feel better about leaving Babylon to rebuild Israel.2 Let’s call this the “late fake theory.”

Why does this matter? The Bible’s opening verses present a simple yet informative overview of our world’s first seven days. Genesis 2:4 clearly says this is “history.” Prophets and apostles elsewhere in the Bible refer to Genesis 1–11 not as fake history but as real events. Jesus backed His argument about marriage by quoting Genesis 1 and 2.3 If authors faked Genesis accounts, then the prophets, apostles, and Jesus were all wrong.4 Two observations help refute the late fake theory.

First, editors today regularly add multiple eyewitness accounts together to build a final report. Finding evidence that more than one author contributed to a book does not mean those authors must have written it eons after the events that are described. They could have written their experiences and then passed them down to trustworthy descendants for future generations.

It looks like that happened in Genesis, with each author noting his contribution with the phrase “this is the genealogy [history] of…” Genesis 5:1 says, “This is the book of the genealogy of Adam.” “Book” in this context means “writing” or “document.” Since no humans existed until Day Six, God must have contributed the first account Himself, ending it in 2:4a with “this is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created.”

Did the ancients associated with this phrase write the other Genesis histories? If so, Adam’s account might have used the words “in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens” to dovetail with the last words of the prior account. ICR founder Henry Morris wrote, “The section from 2:4b through 5:1 was probably written originally by Adam himself.”5 Similarly, “this is the genealogy of Noah” would indicate the end of Noah’s part.6 Noah’s three sons then coauthored the subsequent contribution, and so on.7 Moses could have compiled and edited copies of all 11 accounts into what finally became Genesis a millennium before the supposed forgers.8

Can you find any detail in Genesis 2–4 that Adam could not have known for him-self? Do those chapters contradict Genesis 1? On the contrary, the accounts complement one another. The first chapter seems to come from an all-knowing perspective, while the second chapter fits Adam’s perspective, and a careful study shows no contradictions.9 No evidence from science, archaeology, or the Bible demands or even suggests that unknown authors faked Genesis thousands of years after creation and the Flood.

These two observations expose the late fake theory as nonsense. First, it is possible and permissible for an editor to merge previously written accounts into a final document. Finally, signatures throughout Genesis show that God integrated eyewitness records to compose the trustworthy and true book of beginnings. “For prophecy never came by the will of man [including late fakers], but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.”10

References

  1. Rhymer, J. 1982. Atlas of the Biblical World. New York: Greenwich House, 38.
  2. See also Cooper, W. R. 2011. The Authenticity of Genesis. Portsmouth, UK: Creation Science Movement, 22-27.
  3. Mark 10:6-9.
  4. See also John 5:46-47.
  5. Morris, H. 1976. The Genesis Record. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 83.
  6. Genesis 6:9.
  7. Genesis10:1a. For details, see the free online copy of Wiseman, P. J. 1946. New Discoveries in Babylonia about Genesis, 4th ed. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, Ltd.
  8. For dating Moses, see Wood, B. G. 2005. The Rise and Fall of the 13th-Century Exodus-Conquest Theory. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 48 (3): 475-489.
  9. Lisle, J. 2015. Two Creation Accounts? Acts & Facts. 44 (9): 13.
  10. 2 Peter 1:21.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Brian Thomas, Ph.D. 2015. Did Hebrew Authors Fake the Creation Account?. Acts & Facts. 44 (11).

The Latest
CREATION.LIVE PODCAST
Searching for Truth Across the Globe | Creation.Live Podcast:...
How can we bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the truth of creation to others outside our small spheres of influence?   Host...

NEWS
Marine Mammals: Designed for Deep Diving
While you’re reading this, hold your breath. What is now happening is your blood is delivering the last of oxygenated blood cells to your tissues...

CREATION PODCAST
Humanity's Demise at the Hands of Genetic Entropy | The Creation...
Welcome to the fourth episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth...

NEWS
''Inside-Out'' Fossil is Amazingly Preserved
It is widely known that vast numbers of fossils—vertebrate and invertebrate—have been discovered incredibly well-preserved.1,2...

NEWS
The Resurrection and the Origin of Life
At Easter time we focus on the cardinal Christian doctrine of the Resurrection. Without the Resurrection, Christianity is a sham. The truth that Jesus...

NEWS
Is an Ancient Extinct Tree-Dweller Our Relative?
Human evolution has always been hazy with seemingly as many attempted explanations for how we evolved from animals as there are paleoanthropologists. Evolutionists...

NEWS
The Return of the Dire Wolf?
There’s been much recent excitement about the birth of three dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus) puppies by a Dallas-based biotech company: Colossal Bioscience....

CREATION PODCAST
Cracks in the Layers: Lake Suigetsu and the Old Earth Illusion...
Welcome to the third episode in a series called “The Failures of Old Earth Creationism.” Many Christians attempt to fit old earth...

NEWS
Fish Fossil Vomit
A rather unsavory news story recently appeared regarding fossilized vomit. Although it’s hardly dinner table conversation, it nonetheless supports...

NEWS
Dino Footprints Down Under
Dinosaur trackways1 are once again making the news. Australia is the setting of a remarkable series of dinosaur tracks attributed to ornithischian...