Convergent Evolution or Design-Based Adaptation? | The Institute for Creation Research

Convergent Evolution or Design-Based Adaptation?

Convergent evolution is the idea that the same trait, or set of traits, in completely different organisms were somehow produced through independent evolutionary processes. Now a new study shows how two different types of snakes have adapted to a diversity of environments by expressing the same traits (skin color and skull shape), but the study describes no mechanism for it. The authors simply attribute the highly repeatable process to the mysterious black box of convergent evolution.1

Although both constrictors, pythons and boas are two different types of snakes that evolutionists believe share a common ancestor in the mid-late Cretaceous about 63-96 million years ago during the last alleged age of the dinosaurs.2 Many creationists maintain that pythons and boas are simply different created kinds. A common design explains much of the same genetic programming for some traits since the snakes' lifestyles and habits are similar. However, there are many fundamental differences between them. For example, boas bear live young while pythons lay eggs.

Contrary to popular opinion, both creationists and evolutionists recognize that a fundamental type of organism can diversify and fill different ecological niches. In scientific literature this is referred to as speciation or adaptive radiation. Many evolutionists study this common biological phenomenon and then claim it as proof for molecules-to-man evolution. The problem is that while a creature's traits exhibit diversity based upon the genetic variability of the original creature, the basic organism never changes into anything fundamentally different because of its pre-existing genetic boundaries—the creature simply cannot evolve. In the case of pythons and boas, despite the genetic variability they exhibit when they diversify, they still fundamentally remain pythons and boas.

In this most recent study, scientists investigated boas and pythons that inhabited five different ecological niches: fossorial (digging and living underground), semi-fossorial, semi-aquatic, terrestrial, and semi-arboreal (living in trees part of the time). They found that the colors of the snake's skin and skull morphology (size and shape of the head) were similar for both boas and pythons (See Figure 1) in each of the different ecological niches. They state, "This demonstrates that burrowing species have broader and shorter heads with smaller eyes, whereas the other guilds (eco-types) have thinner and longer heads with larger eyes."

So, did the same mindless evolutionary processes produce the same type of snake speciation in both pythons and boas, or is there a much better explanation? We know from the book of Genesis that not only did God create every creature after their kind, but that He also created built-in programs along with ample genetic diversity that enables them to robustly speciate so they can fill and populate the earth in a variety of ecological niches. Rather than invoking the magic phrase "convergent evolution," it is considerably more rational to ascribe this level of masterful engineering and programming to an omnipotent and all-wise Creator.

References

  1. Esquerré, D. and J. S. Keogh. 2016. Parallel selective pressures drive convergent diversification of phenotypes in pythons and boas. Ecology Letters. 19 (7): 800–809.
  2. Zheng, Y. and J. J. Wiens. 2016. Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Mol. Phylogenetics and Evolution. 94 (Pt B): 537–547. 

*Dr. Tomkins is Director of Life Sciences at the Institute for Creation Research and earned his Ph.D. in genetics from Clemson University.

Article posted on July 7, 2016.

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Chocolate
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts page just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world...

APOLOGETICS
Theism: The Only Way to Go(d)
Countless religious writings and ruins confirm that humans can’t help but worship something or someone. Should we worship Thor, Jesus, Molech,...

ACTS & FACTS
More Than We Knew
Years ago, I visited Israel. Like many believers, I expected the experience would deepen my appreciation for Scripture. What I didn’t expect was...

ACTS & FACTS
Stasis in the Fossil Record: Life That Remains the Same
“You need to learn everything about living insects—they are just like the ones we find in the fossil record!” I still remember hearing...

ACTS & FACTS
Polonium Radiohalos: Strong Evidence Against Millions of Years
The yearlong Genesis Flood deposited the world’s sedimentary rocks about 4,500 years ago, killing and entombing billions of living things...

ACTS & FACTS
New River Gorge National Park and Preserve: How to Slice a Mountain...
by Brian Thomas, Ph.D., and Tim Clarey, Ph.D.* The New River flows 230 miles across southern West Virginia—the only state in the Union whose...

ACTS & FACTS
Engineered Biology: Directly Countering Evolutionary Biology
A longtime advocate for creationism once asked me for an easy way to understand how a theory of biological design (TOBD) fits in the big picture...

NEWS
Computer Simulations Imply Recent, Supernatural Creation of Saturn's...
Conventional scenarios fall short in explaining the origin of moons within our solar system. Recent computer simulations have strengthened the argument...

NEWS
Watching PBS: Don’t Think Too Hard About the Brain’s Origin!
This past summer, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) addressed the subject of origins in the five-part television series Evolution.1...

NEWS
The Engineering Behind Every Heartbeat
The human heart does not beat like a perfect clock. The time between beats changes as the body breathes, moves, rests, and reacts to the world around...