Noah's Ark Game Misses the Boat | The Institute for Creation Research

Noah's Ark Game Misses the Boat

Noah's Ark has been a popular story for children, with its parade of colorful animals living in a floating zoo. But the small and cute boat often pictured in stories, toys, and games is so unlike the gigantic seaworthy vessel described in the Bible that it leaves a misleading impression. How could such a craft possibly have preserved animals and people through a real, historical global flood?

One example of this parody of the biblical Ark is a game for preschoolers produced by Rubik's Cube toy maker Ideal. The Noah's Ark Game1 looks innocuous enough, with a picture of colorful animals crowding the roof and deck of a boat barely large enough to hold them. But it misrepresents the Ark to such a degree that it undermines the feasibility of Scripture's account of the Flood.

Unbelievers often use their personal interpretations of the Noah's Ark account to try to demonstrate that the Bible is false, asserting that it would have been impossible to squeeze two of each animal species onto such a small vessel. But in reality, the Ark was longer than a football field and had more capacity than 500 railroad boxcars.2 And as engineer Tim Lovett illustrated, its dimensions struck the perfect balance between stability and comfort.3

And not all "species" came aboard the Ark. Two of every "kind" of animal would have fit perfectly, and then the later generations that they produced after the floodwaters abated would have diversified into today's species over the last four millennia.4 Geologist John Woodmorappe estimated that about one third of the Ark was needed to house all the animals, even ones that have since become extinct like dinosaurs.5

This left ample room for food and supplies, including space for plants that the Lord instructed Noah to take for food.6 This also fits with the Lord's instruction for Noah to build a window in the Ark,7 which could have supplied the plants with light.

So, the Ark described in the Word of God was sufficient to preserve specimens from all the land and air-dwelling animal groups, as well as Noah and his family. Cute Ark images similar to the one on the game box have appeared in various children's books and other toys and decorations. But they misrepresent the biblical account. And if parents never teach their children that this icon is false, then students are left with the wrong impression of the true nature of biblical history.

References

  1. Noah's Ark Game.
  2. Whitcomb, J. C. and H. M. Morris. 1961. The Genesis Flood. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed Publishing Co., 10, 67-68.
  3. Lovett, T. Noah's Ark: Optimal Proportions. Posted on worldwideflood.com September 2006, accessed January 2, 2012.
  4. Criswell, D. 2009. Speciation and the Animals on the Ark. Acts & Facts. 38 (4): 10.
  5. Woodmorappe, J. 1996. Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study. Santee, CA: Institute for Creation Research, 16.
  6. Genesis 6:21.
  7. Genesis 6:16.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on January 9, 2012.

The Latest
NEWS
Reptile Evolution Ideas Are Challenged—Again
A small fossil reptile with strange and intricate skin outgrowths has been discovered that is forcing evolutionists to once again reexamine their understanding...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Stegosaurus
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world God...

ACTS & FACTS
Adaptive Trait Variation Conferred by Engineered Genetic Diversity
Global environments are highly diverse and dynamic, offering many changes and adaptive challenges to creatures. However, DNA sequence variability engineered...

ACTS & FACTS
Canyonlands National Park: A Bird's-Eye View
Certain overlooks at Canyonlands National Park in eastern Utah make you wish you could soar overhead to see and explore more crannies and canyons. Visitors...

ACTS & FACTS
Criticizing a Perfectly Engineered Eye: Evolutionists Humiliate...
Updated and modified from Guliuzza, R. J. 2016. Major Evolutionary Blunders: Evolutionists Can’t See Eye Design. Acts & Facts. 45 (10): 16–18. Robert...

ACTS & FACTS
Casting Out Doubts: The Fruits of ICR Research
Do you remember the first time that you read about Uzzah and the Ark of the Covenant (2 Samuel 6)? I read it as a young person and remember feeling...

ACTS & FACTS
Seeing Eye-to-Eye
Like all biological structures, explaining the vertebrate eye—or any eye for that matter—is a challenge to neo-Darwinism (modern synthesis)....

APOLOGETICS
Essential Training: A New Series
I teamed up with friends from ICR and Eric Hovind of Creation Today for some campus outreach at two Dallas-area universities just a couple months ago....

NEWS
Grand Canyon Carved by Flood Runoff, Not Lake Spillover
A paper was recently published in Science that suggested a lake may have helped carve Grand Canyon.1 This hypothesis has been scattered throughout...

NEWS
Ammonites on Both Sides of the K-Pg Best Explained by the Global...
It is generally assumed by the vast majority of conventional scientists that an asteroid caused the extinction of 75% of all species on Earth, including...