Surviving Exhibit: Science or Indoctrination? | The Institute for Creation Research

Surviving Exhibit: Science or Indoctrination?

An exhibition favoring evolution has opened to coincide with the “Year of Evolution,” a celebration being held from April 2008 to May 2009 by the University of Pennsylvania and various Philadelphia organizations to commemorate the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin, as well as the 1859 publication of his landmark book On the Origin of Species.1

The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology has worked for the past five years on the interactive, multimedia, “not artifact- but idea-based” show, according to the recent Wall Street Journal article “Smart Riposte to Intelligent Design.”2 Funded largely by the National Science Foundation, the exhibition, titled “Surviving: The Body of Evidence,” opened at the Penn Museum in April and will begin traveling to museums around the country in summer 2009 to spread its vision of an evolution-only explanation for life and the natural world.

A sneak peek into the “evidence” offerings is disturbing, at best. In the first presentation, “video monitors show people running, dancing, talking and eating,” but how this constitutes evidence that favors evolution is not explained. The next section displays the similarities between humans and a supposed mammalian ancestor, complete with the assertion that the ancestor “lived an astonishing 210 million years ago.”2

It is unclear whether the exhibit also mentions that until the past decade, the earliest mammals were thought to have arrived 75 million years ago. In 2002, a fully formed mammal was discovered in China and dated at 125 million,3 and now the record is 220 million.4 Each revision of the date backward pushes the advent of mammals closer to when evolution supposedly started. This leaves less and less time for evolution to have developed mammals from lower creatures, making the tale less and less credible.

In the “Witnessing Evolution” section, people can hear audio clips read from the works of Charles Darwin, Mary Leakey, Carolus Linnaeus, and evolutionary paleontologist Joseph Leidy, further emphasizing the exhibit’s evolution-only focus. Then a giant plastic female model offers the supposed “scars of evolution” that appear in the human body. One of them is the female pelvis, which is portrayed as “a compromise between the need to give birth to a big-brained baby and the requirements for standing upright.”2 But how anatomic features that balance pragmatic constraints of physical life demonstrate proof for evolution is not explained, only assumed.

Crowded wisdom teeth are also presented as “a direct challenge…to intelligent design.”2 However, it is a mischaracterization to presume that every aspect of designed life would be perfect in its modern form. Rather, all that is required to demonstrate design in life is a single perfected, created aspect; one that could not possibly have been achieved by slight, successive modifications. Besides, tooth crowding has been reasonably explained within creation literature as the result of modern dietary changes to processed food.5 It neither refutes the theory of intelligent design, nor supports the theory of upward evolution.

Subverting scientific endeavor to mere whimsical speculation, the exhibit ends with a video showing artistic conceptions of what mankind may evolve into: “…human beings with multiple eyes and limbs,…a more sentient and capable race,” and other fictional scenarios.

Rather than providing a showcase for the achievements of modern science, this federally-funded educational exhibition is blatantly ideological and represents a grand departure from empirical investigation, not to mention the wholesale abandonment of open-minded, clear, or critical thinking. Tax dollars that were meant to promote science are instead promoting outright evolutionary indoctrination. Today’s students will be tomorrow’s scientists. What price will they pay for this legacy of intellectual and evidentiary distortion?

References

  1. University of Pennsylvania and Penn Museum Present “A Year of Evolution” April 2008–May 2009. University of Pennsylvania press release, March 18, 2008.
  2. Klein, J. M. Smart Riposte to Intelligent Design. The Wall Street Journal, August 27, 2008.
  3. Whitfield, J. Tree Climbing With Dinosaurs. Nature News. Posted on Nature.com April 25, 2002, accessed August 27, 2008.
  4. Johnson, G. 2003. The Living World, 3rd Ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 270.
  5. Cuozzo, J. 1998. Buried Alive. Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 213.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer.

Article posted on September 4, 2008.

The Latest
NEWS
Garments for the King
“All thy garments smell of myrrh, and aloes, and cassia, out of the ivory palaces, whereby they have made thee glad.” (Psalm 45:8) One...

NEWS
Bold Claim, Hidden Design: What Salterella Reveals About Early...
What if a fossil no bigger than a grain of rice showed engineering so precise that it still puzzles scientists? That is the intrigue surrounding Salterella,...

CREATION PODCAST
Black Holes are BREAKING the Big Bang! | The Creation Podcast:...
Space is full of some of the strangest and most breath-taking objects in existence. Among them, black holes sit right at the top of the list. They're...

NEWS
Where Did Most of Earth's Species Come From?
Evolutionary naturalism is locked into seeing the entire living world as having evolved from a single common ancestor many millions of years ago.1...

NEWS
A Molecular Snowmobile
People following—or actively involved in—creation science are no doubt aware of the incredible molecular motor called the flagellum,1,2...

NEWS
Rhino Fossil Requires the "Impossible" from Conventional...
A recent study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution claims that the “impossible” actually happened—not just once, but three...

NEWS
December 2025 ICR Wallpaper
"Come now, and let us reason together," Says the LORD, "Though your sins are like scarlet, They shall be as white as snow; Though they...

NEWS
The Bipedal Two-Step of Human Evolution
The supposed evolution of bipedalism continues to be a major obstacle in the narrative that humans evolved from apelike ancestors.1,2 For...

CREATION PODCAST
The James Webb Space Telescope vs The Big Bang | The Creation...
When you look into the night sky, you’re seeing light that has traveled incredible distances to reach you. For centuries, astronomers have used telescopes...

CREATION PODCAST
Dr. Randy Guliuzza | From Learning to Leadership | The Creation...
For more than 50 years, the Institute for Creation Research has continued its mission to show how scientific evidence confirms the truth of Scripture....