Snake Venom, Genetic Entropy, and Adam's Curse | The Institute for Creation Research

Snake Venom, Genetic Entropy, and Adam's Curse

Unbelievers and Christians alike often ask, “How could a good god make creatures with toxic venom?” According to the Bible, God originally created the world free of death, disease, and violence. When Adam and Eve rebelled, the entire creation was subjected to a curse that resulted, among other things, in venomous snakes, stinging arthropods, and disease-causing pathogens.

A major question facing creation biologists is how this curse has affected the genomes of modern creatures that defy the idea of a perfect creation, such as poisonous snakes. A highly plausible, biblical, and scientific model is now emerging and gaining validity thanks to recent snake studies. This model is based on information corruption in the genome, sometimes referred to as genetic entropy. Support for this idea is based on the fact that genes and their regulatory sequences have become corrupted through genome degradation—resulting in traits inconsistent with the original intent of God’s creation.

Evolutionists originally believed new snake venom genes came about by the duplication of genes that have other important tasks in the snake’s body. However, in a recent study, scientists found that duplication of regions containing genes rarely produces anything good.1 Instead, they took a different approach and looked for other explanations of snake venom outside the standard evolutionary framework. The researchers analyzed and compared gene expression in venom glands and other body tissues in a wide variety of venomous and non-venomous snakes. They even included tissues from the gecko, a little lizard.

Amazingly, the researchers claimed, “We find the hypothesis that snake venom evolves through the duplication of physiological or body genes and subsequent recruitment into the venom gland to be unsupported by the available data,” and “indeed for a large number of the gene families claimed to have undergone recruitment [used for other purposes after being duplicated] we find evidence of a diverse tissue expression pattern, including the salivary gland of nonvenomous reptiles.”1 The key importance of this discovery is that venom genes are not the products of hypothetical evolutionary processes (i.e., gene duplication). Instead, the data show they are important DNA sequences that serve other purposes in a wide variety of reptile tissues. We see the same thing in the human body—the same genes are expressed in a variety of different tissues.

In another study, researchers utilized a comprehensive set of 24 reptilian venom-gene families that they compared to the genome of the Burmese python, a non-venomous snake.2 They also analyzed gene expression datasets from 12 different python tissues. This research further vindicated the emerging genetic model revealed by the previous study, namely that the genes that encode venom proteins are not specific to venom glands but are actually expressed in many different tissues throughout the snake’s body. The difference in the venom glands is that some genes are expressed in much greater quantities—resulting in greater amounts of venom proteins. This dosage-dependent phenomenon explains the toxic properties of venom. The purpose of these proteins produced at lower concentrations in other bodily tissues has not been fully investigated and is not well understood.

Interestingly, the first study also showed that the increased expression of venom genes was probably due to the corruption of regulatory DNA sequences that act like switches outside the gene itself.1 These specialized genetic sequences tell the gene what tissues to function in and how much product to make. Therefore, mutations in these regions cause genes to become misregulated, resulting in elevated levels of proteins in venom glands for some snake species. Creation scientists would predict this type of scenario resulting from the corruption of genetic information associated with the curse and the degradation of the genome over time.

Both studies indicate that venom genes serve other non-venomous purposes in a variety of reptile tissues. The toxic amounts of venom proteins in modern venomous snakes are likely due to the genomic degradation of regulatory switches that alter a gene’s expression patterns. Research has shown that genomes have undergone a process of information corruption initiated during the Adamic curse, not an upward evolutionary improvement.

References

  1. Hargreaves, A. D. et al. 2014. Restriction and recruitment – gene duplication and the origin and evolution of snake venom toxins. Genome Biology and Evolution. 6 (8): 2088-2095.
  2. Reyes-Velasco, J. et al. 2015. Expression of venom gene homologs in diverse python tissues suggests a new model for the evolution of snake venom. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 32 (1): 173-183.

* Dr. Tomkins is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and received his Ph.D. in genetics from Clemson University.

Cite this article: Jeffrey P. Tomkins, Ph.D. 2015. Snake Venom, Genetic Entropy, and Adam's Curse. Acts & Facts. 44 (5).

The Latest
NEWS
Was an Insect Ancestor Discovered?
There is nothing simple about an animal group called the euarthropods (phylum Euarthropoda), which includes insects, crustaceans, and extinct trilobites. Evolutionists...

NEWS
October 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"The people who walked in darkness Have seen a great light; Those who dwelt in the land of the shadow of death, Upon them a light...

NEWS
Collapsed Utah Arch Prompts Questions about Arch Formation
We lost a natural wonder to gravity and erosion on Thursday, August 8, 2024.1 Those who visited Double Arch, also called “Hole in the...

ACTS & FACTS
ICR 2024 Resource Catalog
At the Institute for Creation Research, our mission is not only to conduct research demonstrating how science confirms Scripture but also to share this...

CREATION.LIVE PODCAST
Beetle Blasts and Biomimetics | Creation.Live Podcast: Episode...
Though tiny, the bombardier beetle is a fascinating masterclass in design. Evolutionists claim that this explosive insect came about by chance,...

NEWS
Another Arch Collapse at a National Park
Erosion and other natural forces upon sedimentary formations such as exposed cliffs and arches belie the millions of years during which they allegedly...

CREATION PODCAST
Living in Light of Genesis | The Creation Podcast: Episode 82
The world tells us that the book of Genesis is, if not entirely, at least partially a myth. We are told that history, archaeology, and science...

NEWS
Does Pauli Exclusion Rescue Dino Protein?
Perhaps no other fossil discoveries have rocked the world of paleontology more than original organics like proteins in old bones. ICR helps curate a...

NEWS
Support the ICR Discovery Center on North Texas Giving Day 2024!
It's North Texas Giving Day! We invite you to support our unique creation museum and planetarium in Dallas, TX—the ICR Discovery Center. Your...

NEWS
Evolution's Hypothetical Last Universal Common Ancestor
Evolutionists utilize a theoretical tree of life that takes people, plants, and animals back into deep evolutionary time to an unobserved, unknown,...