Second Look Causes Scientist to Reverse Dino-Bird Claim | The Institute for Creation Research

Second Look Causes Scientist to Reverse Dino-Bird Claim

Stephen Czerkas digs dinosaurs. His early advocacy for feathered dinosaurs makes his recent reversal that much more remarkable. His reexamination of a fossil—one that had been known as a feathered dinosaur—reveals the fruits of taking a closer look at spectacular claims.

Recently working with University of North Carolina's fossil bird expert Alan Feduccia, Czerkas imaged a Scansoriopteryx with advanced 3-D microscopy and high-resolution photography, visualizing features in the wrist bones, feathers and hind limbs. This year they published their results in the Journal of Ornithology.1

Back in 1999, the National Geographic Society created quite a controversy by prematurely announcing the discovery of a half-bird/half-dinosaur fossil they called Archaeoraptor.2 Czerkas and the Dinosaur Museum in Blanding, Utah purchased the Chinese specimen from an anonymous dealer at the Tucson gem show in early 1999 for the tidy sum of $80,000. The Society quickly announced the so-called "feathered" dinosaur before scientists carefully reviewed the specimen, which turned out to be a complete fabrication.

Stephen Czerkas had been intimately involved in the purchase and promotion of the Archaeoraptor specimen as a bird-like dinosaur. But he actually purchased bird and dinosaur parts that had been artificially combined! A short time later, author and researcher Jonathan Wells labeled the specimen the "Piltdown Bird" in memory of the infamous Piltdown Man hoax involving a composite of ape and human bones.3

In 2002, Czerkas and his wife self-published a book called Feathered Dinosaurs and the Origin of Flight in which they discussed Scansoriopteryx in context of dinosaur evolution into birds.4 His stance on Archaeoraptor as a real fossil did a complete flip-flop shortly after its exposure as a fraud, and now his stance on Scansoriopteryx as a dinosaur has reversed as well.

This year he told science news outlet Eurkalert, "The identification of Scansoriopteryx as a non-dinosaurian bird enables a reevaluation in the understanding of the relationship between dinosaurs and birds. Scientists finally have the key to unlock the doors that separate dinosaurs from birds."5 It turns out the fossil is just another bird, not some bird-dinosaur hybrid it was promoted to be.

Who's to say the "key" that separates dinosaurs from birds isn't simply feathers? Only birds have them today. If not feathers, bird-specific bone anatomy is often enough to clearly separate birds from reptiles.6

This extinct bird's distinct anatomy fits Scripture's explanation that birds were birds and dinosaurs were dinosaurs from the moments of their creation on days five and six of the creation week. And the very fact that the bird specimen was fossilized, having been buried rapidly in mud, fits Scripture's explanation that all air-breathing, land-living creatures perished unless they were among the cadre on board the ark.

The fact that serious scientists had been willing to label Scansoriopteryx a dinosaur despite its distinct bird body and feathers surely says more about scientists and their "science" than it does about the fossil.

References

  1. Czerkas, S. A., and A. Feduccia. Jurassic archosaur is a non-dinosaurian bird. Journal of Ornithology. Published online July 9, 2014.
  2. Sloan, C. P. 1999. Feathers for T. rex? New birdlike fossils are missing links in dinosaur evolution. National Geographic. 196 (5): 98-107.
  3. Wells, J. 2000. Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.
  4. Czerkas, S. J. (Ed.) 2002. Feathered Dinosaurs and the Origin of Flight. Blanding, UT: Dinosaur Museum. (The museum website hosts an abbreviated version of the Scansoriopteryx book chapter, in which Czerkas wrote, "With the discovery of Scansoriopteryx, the concept of birds evolving 'from the trees down' is certainly supported more than the 'ground up' scenario.") 
  5. Bayez, R. Researchers declassify dinosaurs as being the great-great-grandparents of birds. Eurekalert. Posted on eurekalert.org July 9, 2014, accessed July 11, 2014. 
  6. Thomas, B. Fixed Bird Thigh Nixes Dino-to-bird Development. Creation Science Update. Posted on icr.org June 22, 2009, accessed July 14, 2014. 

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on July 18, 2014.

The Latest
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Heroes of Creation Science: Henry M. Morris
“The creation/evolution issue is, in a very real sense, the most fundamental issue of all.” —Henry M. Morris Many people believe the...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Fungi
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts page just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world...

APOLOGETICS
What is True and False?
by Patrick C . Marks, D. Min., and Brian Thomas, Ph.D.* In the first article of this series, we explained that truth—that which matches reality—is...

ACTS & FACTS
The Cambrian Layer: Explosion or Burial?
The lowest sedimentary layer, rich in hard-shelled fossils, is known as the Cambrian record. Beneath it is the Precambrian, which contains far fewer...

ACTS & FACTS
My Sheep Hear My Voice
Young people today can access more information in a matter of days than many people could acquire in an entire lifetime just a century ago. Smartphones,...

ACTS & FACTS
The Land of Truffula Trees
Deserts are often viewed as barren wastelands, yet they boast some of the most captivating organisms on Earth. You have to be unusual to live in a desert,...

ANNOUNCEMENTS
New Novel: The Third Heaven
A visionary plays God by offering mankind the final step in human evolution: the creation of perfectly fabricated transhuman minds and bodies designed...

ACTS & FACTS
Did Sauropod Dinosaurs Live for Centuries?
Humans living before Noah’s Flood routinely had 900-year lifespans (Genesis 5). The Bible gives no hint that this longevity was in any way miraculous....

ANNOUNCEMENTS
9 Resources: What ICR Believes About Natural Selection and Why
Mutation-Selection: A Calamitous Creationist Concession Creation biologists have traditionally accepted some form of mutation-selection...

NEWS
The Incredible Narwhal Tusk
Most of us are familiar with the narwhal, a bizarre arctic mammal that sports a long, twisted tusk, earning the creature its nickname, the unicorn of...