The Unpredictable Pattern of Bioluminescence | The Institute for Creation Research

The Unpredictable Pattern of Bioluminescence

Three of my daughters took a night swim in a bioluminescent bay during a mission trip to Puerto Rico in 2012. They splashed water on their heads and watched their hair glow green from countless tiny shining dinoflagellates. It was a once in a lifetime experience!

If just one animal on earth had the ability to generate its own light, then we should praise the Lord for designing such a wonder. But dozens of different kinds of animals can bioluminesce, multiplying the Maker’s glory. Most of the scientists who study bioluminescence wrongfully divert that praise from God to nature. They tell stories of how natural processes supposedly constructed the complicated bio-machinery that so efficiently produces cold light in living cells. However, one review study of bioluminescence encountered two obstacles that force evolution’s story to steer in circles.1

The list of bioluminescent species includes bacteria, fungi, jellyfish, sea worms, sea slugs, clams, squid, roundworms, beetles, isopods, ostracods, copepods, shrimp, centipedes, millipedes, sea stars, crinoids, fish, sharks, tunicates, and many other less familiar living things. Scientists continue to discover more bioluminescent species.

Evolutionary researchers organize all of these basic forms onto a preconceived “tree of life” that supposedly shows how closely related each form might be to another, assuming all creatures share common ancestry.2 Evolutionists expect one creature to have evolved bioluminescence and then to have passed that trait along to its descendants. However, the researchers do not find this or any other evolutionary pattern. Instead, bioluminescence is scattered willy-nilly among dozens of totally different life forms.

The study authors, publishing in the Annual Review of Marine Science, wrote, “The distribution of bioluminescence across the major taxonomic [animal] groups does not appear to follow any obvious phylogenetic [evolutionary] or oceanographic constraint.”1 This mismatch between theory and reality presents the first obstacle evolutionists face.

Some animal groups are mostly bioluminescent but include a few “dull” members. Other groups are mostly non-luminous but have a handful that shine just fine. These “unpredictable patterns are found within many phyla.” Evolutionists must desperately cling to the unlikely “estimate that bioluminescence has evolved a minimum of 40 times, and likely more than 50 times, among extant organisms.”1

Similarly, a separate study mapped mammals with an appendix, a small organ attached to intestines. The evolutionists “found that the 50 species [with an appendix, out of 361 mammals] are scattered so widely across the tree that the structure must have evolved independently at least 32 times, and perhaps as many as 38 times.”3 These scattered patterns readily fit into the biblical account of creation. The Creator built bioluminescence, as well as an appendix, into just those bodies that He wished.4 If bioluminescence evolved so often in the past, then why is it not evolving today?

In addition to their failure to explain which animals should glow, evolutionists encounter a biochemical problem—the second obstacle. Each bioluminescing animal appears to use unique specifics in its light production, and all of them require precise molecular machine parts. A vitamin-like molecule called a “luciferin” emits a photon of light when it reacts with oxygen. An enzyme controls this reaction as its specific luciferin docks into a fitted pouch. The enzymes also have on-off switches. Many animals turn off banks of enzymes to dim their lights. If unregulated, animals could conceivably glow themselves to death!

Engineers envy the efficiency of bioluminescence.5 Whoever designed its differing strategies outperformed human engineers on all 40-plus attempts. Evolutionary stories about bioluminescence have far too difficult a task surmounting these two scientific obstacles for them to stand in the way of the brilliant Creator getting the credit He deserves.

References

  1. Haddock, S. H. D., M. A. Moline, and J. F. Case. 2010. Bioluminescence in the Sea. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2 (2010): 443-493.
  2. Sherwin, F. and B. Thomas. 2009. Darwin’s Withering Tree of Life. Acts & Facts. 38 (5): 16.
  3. Barras, C. Appendix Evolved More Than 30 Times. Science Now. Posted on news.sciencemag.org February 12, 2013, accessed February 13, 2013.
  4. Thomas, B. 2008. The Gaps in “The God of the Gaps.” Acts & Facts. 37 (11): 15.
  5. Hadhazy, A. 6 Bright Ideas for Bioluminescence Tech. Popular Mechanics. Posted on popularmechanics.com, accessed February 21, 2013.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Thomas, B. 2013. The Unpredictable Pattern of Bioluminescence. Acts & Facts. 42 (4): 17.

The Latest
ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Geysers
by Renée Dusseau and Susan Windsor* You're never too young to be a creation scientist and explore our Creator's world. Kids, discover...

ACTS & FACTS
Sharing Our Creator's Truth
My name is Bill, and I’m the information technology manager at the Institute for Creation Research. I keep everything technical running and make...

ACTS & FACTS
Engineered Parallel Gene Codes Defy Evolution
Researchers over the past decade have been characterizing new, previously hidden genetic codes embedded within the same sections of genes that code...

ACTS & FACTS
La Brea Tar Pits at Hancock Park: Post-Flood Catastrophes
The La Brea Tar Pits have fascinated visitors ever since Spanish explorer Gaspar de Portolá chronicled the site in 1769.1 But even...

ACTS & FACTS
Proclaiming Christ in Paradise: An Interview with Dr. Brian Thomas
For more than 50 years, the Institute for Creation Research has investigated the evidence showing how science supports the Bible’s account of...

ACTS & FACTS
Why Biology Needs A Theory of Biological Design—Part 4
Nobel Prize-winning German physicist Max Planck perceptively observed that “if you change the way you look at things, the things you look...

NEWS
Long Ages and the Bible—What’s the Problem?
The problem with mixing long ages and the Bible stems from how someone interprets Genesis 1 and 2. If these chapters are read as symbolic and/or poetic...

CREATION PODCAST
Living for a Millennium?! | The Creation Podcast: Episode 80
Scripture describes humans living for a very long time, nearly a millennium before the Flood. Many scoff at this, stating that this is reason...

NEWS
More Mixed Land and Marine Fossils in Wales
Flood geologists expect to find marine fossils mixed in the same layers as land animal and land plant fossils. We see it all over the world.1,2...

CREATION.LIVE PODCAST
The Mind-Blowing Purpose of Outer Space | Creation.Live Podcast:...
What is the purpose of space? The night sky is a vast canvas of stars and planets, far more than we could ever count, yet the Lord knows them all...