Can Evolution Explain Altruism in Our Children? | The Institute for Creation Research

Can Evolution Explain Altruism in Our Children?

Research has shown that humans like to help, even before they are old enough to have been taught how to do so. This innate characteristic distinguishes humans from their supposed closest evolutionary family member, the chimpanzee, which doesn’t demonstrate the same altruistic behavior.

In studies on the subject, at only 18 months old, toddlers were observed to consistently aid unrelated adults in simple tasks such as opening a door or picking up a clothes pin. Researchers assumed then that altruism, or unselfish concern for the welfare of others, evolved early in humans. But does this conclusion necessarily follow from the observations?

Dr. Michael Tomasello of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany also found that three-year-old children seemed to have an innate belief that all participants in a game ought to play by the rules. Tomasello believes that the “idea of group rules” comes from what he calls “shared intentionality,” attributing these actions to a sense of what the others in the group expect.1

Tomasello believes that “shared intentionality evolved very early in the human lineage,” according to a recent article in The New York Times. Perhaps, “in order to survive, people were forced to cooperate in hunting game or gathering fruit.”1 However, while this theory is feasible from the evolutionary perspective, no evidence is offered to support it. No other animal needs or uses the uniquely human capacities for cooperation to hunt or find food successfully, so it stretches credulity to claim that successful hunting must have hinged on a cooperation that depended on unwritten rules of behavior.

Such unwritten rules consist of information, not physical structures, and therefore lie outside the scope of Darwinian natural selection. But presuming that people were forced to cooperate to hunt for survival, there is no realistic natural mechanism whereby such behavior can be selected. Physical traits corresponding to only a few genes are sometimes selected―although only when other traits are de-selected and the overall information content drops―but not behaviors. These would seem to depend on the interaction of a wide variety of many genes, as well as specific cognitive knowledge.

In his book, Why We Cooperate, Tomasello wrote, “Children are altruistic by nature.” But he added that humans are also naturally selfish: “That’s why we have moral dilemmas.”1

There is nothing within the observations of innate human altruism to suggest that this behavior evolved. Such a conclusion is only the consensus of those who hold an evolutionary view of origins, including Hillard Kaplan, an anthropologist at the University of New Mexico, and primatologist Frans de Waal, also mentioned in the NYT article.

Biblically-consistent history makes more sense of these observations. Where did the human sense of obligation or “ought to” come from? Scriptures refer to a uniquely human immaterial feature called a conscience.2 This is an internal voice that warns of moral danger and informs of moral violations. Since children are people, too, it makes sense that they have developing consciences, as well as knowledge of rules or laws “written in their hearts,”3 to which their consciences refer.

Did this dichotomy between being selfish and altruistic come from human ancestors who were forced to find food together? Only by rejecting biblical history could this tall tale assume a semblance of credibility. But when the Bible is not dismissed, it seems easy enough to match the observed altruism of humans with their God-given consciences, as well as associate their selfishness with a fallen and sinful nature.4

These researchers have shown exactly what the Bible has been saying all along, that humans are well-designed moral creatures who have fallen from their original perfect relationship with their Creator. But thank God, He has revealed the Way out of this fallen state.5

References

  1. Wade, N. We May Be Born With an Urge to Help. The New York Times. Posted on nytimes.com November 30, 2009, accessed December 1, 2009.
  2. For example, John 8:9.
  3. Romans 2:15.
  4. Romans 3:23: “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.”
  5. Romans 3:24: “Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.”

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on December 8, 2009.

The Latest
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Heroes of Creation Science: Henry M. Morris
“The creation/evolution issue is, in a very real sense, the most fundamental issue of all.” —Henry M. Morris Many people believe the...

ACTS & FACTS
Creation Kids: Fungi
Hi, kids! We created a special Acts & Facts page just for you! Have fun doing the activities while learning about the wonderful world...

APOLOGETICS
What is True and False?
by Patrick C . Marks, D. Min., and Brian Thomas, Ph.D.* In the first article of this series, we explained that truth—that which matches reality—is...

ACTS & FACTS
The Cambrian Layer: Explosion or Burial?
The lowest sedimentary layer, rich in hard-shelled fossils, is known as the Cambrian record. Beneath it is the Precambrian, which contains far fewer...

ACTS & FACTS
My Sheep Hear My Voice
Young people today can access more information in a matter of days than many people could acquire in an entire lifetime just a century ago. Smartphones,...

ACTS & FACTS
The Land of Truffula Trees
Deserts are often viewed as barren wastelands, yet they boast some of the most captivating organisms on Earth. You have to be unusual to live in a desert,...

ANNOUNCEMENTS
New Novel: The Third Heaven
A visionary plays God by offering mankind the final step in human evolution: the creation of perfectly fabricated transhuman minds and bodies designed...

ACTS & FACTS
Did Sauropod Dinosaurs Live for Centuries?
Humans living before Noah’s Flood routinely had 900-year lifespans (Genesis 5). The Bible gives no hint that this longevity was in any way miraculous....

ANNOUNCEMENTS
9 Resources: What ICR Believes About Natural Selection and Why
Mutation-Selection: A Calamitous Creationist Concession Creation biologists have traditionally accepted some form of mutation-selection...

NEWS
The Incredible Narwhal Tusk
Most of us are familiar with the narwhal, a bizarre arctic mammal that sports a long, twisted tusk, earning the creature its nickname, the unicorn of...