Do 'Useless' Organs Prove Humans Evolved? | The Institute for Creation Research

Do 'Useless' Organs Prove Humans Evolved?

People who believe humans evolved from an ape-like animal millions of years ago claim we have many useless organs. They say these organs once had a function in our evolutionary past, and that’s why these “leftover” remnants can still be found in humans today.

One common example is the human appendix. Until recent years, most evolutionists believed the appendix was once much larger and helped us digest plant fiber, as it does in rabbits. Since it is smaller than those of some apes and proportionally smaller than those of other animals, they assumed it lost much or most of its past usefulness.

Charles Darwin first described this vestigial argument over 150 years ago. He called these structures rudimentary organs, meaning they are supposedly underdeveloped compared to those of our ape-like ancestors. The so-called useless or vestigial organs included the appendix, tonsils, wisdom teeth, coccyx (“tailbone”), thyroid, goose bumps, and those ear muscles that allow some people to wiggle their ears. Many popular books and magazines still make these vestigial claims.

Modern medical research has now found important uses for every one of these so-called useless organs. Tweet: Modern medical research has now found important uses for every one of these so-called useless organs.

Do 'Useless' Organs Prove Humans Evolved? http://www.icr.org/article/do-useless-organs-prove-humans-evolved/

@icrscience

Modern medical research has now found important uses for every one of these so-called useless organs. Yet, some biology textbooks still assert that many vestigial organs exist in humans. Even my copy of the Encyclopedia Britannica claims that humans have over 100 vestigial organs.1 I have taught college-level anatomy for over 30 years. Of the three different anatomy textbooks I’ve used, not one has made the claim that some organ or structure is vestigial. All of them merely noted the supposed vestigial organs’ locations and functions.

Years ago, my long search for evidence of vestigial organs actually revealed many uses for each organ I studied. This helped convince me that evolution is wrong. The results became the book Vestigial Organs Are Fully Functional, which documents the functions of most of these organs and structures.2

Unfortunately, past claims that these organs are useless discouraged research into their functions. Just think of the tonsils. They lie at the back of our throats and help detect invading bacteria. In the 1930s, over half of all children had their tonsils removed, partly because doctors believed they were useless and would only cause problems later in life. Early doctors thought it was best to remove tonsils when a child was young. After more research, scientists found that tonsils help defend the body, and the number of operations fell fast. Currently, less than one in 1,000 children get their tonsils removed!

Do vestigial organs show evolution? No—vestigial organs don’t even exist! Tweet: Do vestigial organs show evolution? No…vestigial organs don’t even exist!

Do 'Useless' Organs Prove Humans Evolved? http://www.icr.org/article/do-useless-organs-prove-humans-evolved/

@icrscience

Today, doctors don’t usually remove tonsils unless a patient suffers from frequent severe infections or a breathing blockage. The removal of tonsils adds risks like severe bleeding, weakened immune systems, and infections. We now know that the operation, on average, helps very little. Plus, any benefits only last about a year. Do vestigial organs show evolution? No—vestigial organs don’t even exist!

References

  1. Safra, J., ed. 2003. Biological Sciences. The New Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 14. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1082.
  2. Bergman, J. 1990. Vestigial Organs Are Fully Functional. Terre Haute, IN: Creation Research Society Books.

* Dr. Bergman is Research Associate at the Institute for Creation Research and Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Toledo Medical School in Ohio.

Cite this article: Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. 2018. Do 'Useless' Organs Prove Humans Evolved?. Acts & Facts. 47 (4).

The Latest
NEWS
The Light of Christmas
Over the last two millennia, December 25th became the customary commemoration of the birth of Christ. But this was not always so. Other dates were recognized...

NEWS
Butterfly Learning and Memory
Insects, such as the winged insects in the order Lepidoptera, continue to reveal incredible abilities with some facets that zoologists thought were...

CREATION PODCAST
3 Game-Changing Benefits of a Theory of Biological Design | The...
Science is objective. At least, that’s what we’re told. But there are inherent issues with this statement that can cause very real...

NEWS
Hong Kong Dinosaurs Explained by the Flood
The recent discovery of the first dinosaur fossils in Hong Kong came as a surprise to evolutionary paleontologists. It was totally unexpected since...

NEWS
''Ancient'' Skin Impressions
Cornified skin is the top layer of skin (epidermis) and is composed of dead skin cells that are tightly packed together and thickened. This is the Creator’s...

NEWS
Heart Cockle Shells: Another Amazing Case for Creation
There has been an incredible discovery concerning a bivalve mollusk called the heart cockle (Corculum cardissa). These bivalves have symbiotic partnerships...

NEWS
Bird Brain Evolution?
Recently, a fascinating bird skull dated by evolutionists to be over “80 million years old” was discovered at a Brazilian quarry.1 Paleontologists...

CREATION PODCAST
Undoing Darwin's DEVIOUS Designs | The Creation Podcast: Episode...
Science is objective. At least, that’s what we’re told. But there are inherent issues with this statement...

NEWS
December 2024 ICR Wallpaper
"Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel." (Isaiah...

CREATION.LIVE PODCAST
From the Beginning to the End | Creation.Live Podcast: Episode...
Genesis and Revelation provide stunning bookends of the biblical canon. The first describes the beginning of creation while the second gives us...